APS Home
American Psychological Society Representing scientific psychology and promoting the giving away of psychology in the public interest.
For Members Convention Journals Advocacy Employment Ads Join APS

Author Administration Submission Rules Update Profile Logout


   
Type of Submission:   Poster
Submission Date:   01/29/03
Review Status:   ACCEPTED
Back to Author Administration Last Review Date:   02/24/03


APS Program View
This Poster submission will be displayed in the Program as follows:

DEFRANCESCO, Gina : Salve Regina University; and FIGUEIREDO, Keri : Salve Regina University; and KOGANEI, Kiyoko: Salve Regina University; and QUINN, Sheila O.: Salve Regina University
Not All Shows are Reality Shows: A Comparison of Conversational Styles
This poster examines the accuracy of gender-language differences as portrayed in two popular television shows: Friends and Mad About You. Contradicting the results of previous research, our results indicated no significant differences in the frequencies of interruptions, expletives, apologies or emotional exclamations between the sexes as portrayed by these shows.


Full Submission Information

Title: Not All Shows are Reality Shows: A Comparison of Conversational Styles
Subject Area(s): Primary:  General    Secondary: Cognitive   
Author : Gina DeFrancesco
Salve Regina University
Co-Author 1: Keri Figueiredo
Salve Regina University
Co-Author 2: Kiyoko Koganei
Salve Regina University
Co-Author 3: Sheila O. Quinn Ph.D.
Salve Regina University

Abstract:

This poster examines the accuracy of gender-language differences as portrayed in two popular television shows: Friends and Mad About You. Contradicting the results of previous research, our results indicated no significant differences in the frequencies of interruptions, expletives, apologies or emotional exclamations between the sexes as portrayed by these shows.

Supporting Summary:

Introduction Our study measured gender differences in mixed-gender conversations as portrayed in two popular television shows, Friends and Mad About You. Previous research has shown gender differences in conversational style as measured by frequencies of apologies, emotional exclamations, expletives (Bayard & Sateesh 2001), and interruptions (Okamoto, Rashotte, & Smith-Lovin 2002). The results of our study indicated that the conversational styles presented by these two popular television shows differed from that of the spontaneous social conversations examined in previous research. Method Procedure The frequency of each of the dependent variables (See below.) was recorded during nine scenes of mixed-sex conversations from each of the two shows. We chose these two television shows because they are popular, long-running, and attempt to portray modern American lifestyles. We chose each of the scenes because both sexes were represented and at least two or more people contributed to the conversation. Scenes were chosen from one television season for each show and ranged from approximately 1.5 to 3.5 minutes each. Inter-rater reliability on each of the variables in 50 % of the scenes was obtained. Dependent Variables Dependent variables were operationally defined as follows: (a) Apologies were defined as the statements of regret for a past action or current state. (b) Emotional Exclamations were defined as an exclamation indicating surprise or heightened emotion. Examples of these exclamations included “ouch”, “oh.”, “wow”, “no, no” or gasping. (c) Expletives were defined as swearing or words that are generally considered offensive. A list of examples was generated before data collection began. (d) An interruption was defined as a break in the continuity of conversation by a second speaker. Analysis and Results A significant Pearson Product Moment correlation (r(18) = .963, p< .001) indicated adequate reliability between the two observers on all variables. Statistical analysis (ANOVA’s) indicated that, unlike the results of previous research, there were no significant differences between the sexes on the frequencies of interruptions (F(1,34) = 2.23, p = .145), expletives (F(1,34) = .85, p = .363), apologies (F(1,34) = 1.94, p = .172) or emotional exclamations (F(1, 34) = .000, p = 1.0: The sexes were exactly the same in frequency on this variable.) Further, there were no significant differences between the shows on any of the gender variables. This implies that these popular shows do not accurately portray modern American styles of conversation. The results of the observations of these scripted conversations do not confirm the results of previous research done on spontaneous social conversation. The poster will provide information on the demographics of the shows’ popularity and discuss implications of the misrepresentations of typical gender language interactions.